Truy cập nội dung luôn
Quay lại

Module 5. Description-HUST 4 pilot 2-Jan 2020

 

Module Description

 

Module Title:    Recognition and validation of language skills in line with the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR).  Key languages are English and German.

 

ECTS:     02 ECTS

 

Module Aims and Overview:

This module aims to:

- Provide students with knowledge of the common European Framework of Reference (CEFR)

- Validate the framework with other international English assessment tests such as Cambridge tests and VSTEP (Vietnamese Standardized Test of English Proficiency).

 

Course Code: CATALYST M05

 

Course Duration: 02 ECTS (60 hours) (1 academic hour is 60 minutes)

  • 25 hours for in-class study

  • 35 hours for self-study

 

Language of Instruction & Level:

English and Vietnamese

English and Laotian

CEFR –B2/C1

 

Learning Outcomes:

Upon completion of the module, the students will be able to:

  1. Gain an insight into the principles for teaching and learning, for assessment, for use of reference level descriptions, and general usage of CEFR. 

  2. Apply the CEFR in practice: aligning other certification systems such as VSTEP (Vietnamese Standardized Test of English Proficiency) and Cambridge ESOL examinations to CEFR.

 

Detailed Module Description:

The module consists of 5 lessons as follows:

 

Contents

Activities

Assignments

Lesson 1: Overview of CEFR

1.1 What the CEFR is and what it is not

1.2. A brief history of the CEFR

1.3. How to read the CEFR

Lectures

Discussion

Task completion

Project

  • Home reading

Lesson 2: CEFR principles for teaching and learning

Lectures

Discussion

Task completion

Project

  • Quiz

  • Home reading

Lesson 3: CEFR Principles for Assessment

Lectures

Discussion

Task completion

Project

  • Home reading

  • Presentation

(groups 1-2)

30 mins/group

Lesson 4: CEFR Principles for Use of Reference Level Descriptions

Lectures

Discussion

Task completion

Project

  • Home reading

  • Presentation

(groups 3-4)

30 mins/group

Lesson 5: Applying the CEFR in practice

Applying the CEFR in practice: Aligning VSTEP and Cambridge ESOL examinations to the CEFR

 

Lectures

Discussion

Group work

Project

  • Home reading

  • Presentation

(groups 5-6)

30 mins/group

  • Written assignment

 

Module Organizer Contact Details:

Name:         Dr. Ngo Phuong Anh

Office:         204 D4 Building, HUST

Email:        anh.ngophuong@hust.edu.vn

Institution:        Hanoi University of Science and Technology 

Name(s) of Trainer(s):     Ngo Phuong Anh

Pham Hoai Anh

Nguyen My Binh

DauThi Le Hieu

Le Nu Cam Le

 

Target Groups:

Fourth year English-majored students in Teacher Education program

 

Participant Requirements:

B2-C1 Level (CEFR)

 

Module Materials (list only):

  1. Description and samples of VSTEP (2015). Hanoi: National University Press. (Lesson 5, Handout 5)

  2. English Profile – Introducing the CEFR for English, Cambridge University Press, retrieved from:

https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/cefr/

(In class materials, Lesson 4, Handout 1, p. 3; Handout 2, pp. 13-17; Handout 5, p. 20; Lesson 5).

  1. Https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/cefr/ (Handouts 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D)

  2. Http://englishprofile.org/wordlists (Lesson 4, Handout 3, Handout 4)

  3. Messick, S. (1996). Validity and Washback in Language Testing. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J. (Lesson 3 – Handout 2)

  4. Paterson, D.G. (August 21, 1926). Do New and Old Type Examinations Measure Different Mental Functions? School and Society, vol. 24, 246-48. (Lesson 3 – Handout 1)

  5. Sax, G., & Collet, L.S. (1968). An Empirical Comparison of the Effects of Recall and Multiple-Choice Tests on Student Achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, vol. 5, 169-73. (Lesson 3 – Handout 1).

  6. Test Item Analysis. Retrieved from Https://www.accs.cc/default/assets/File/DPE_CTE/CurriculumDevelopment/Teaching%20Tips%2C%20Tools%2C%20and%20Techniques/Student%20Assessment/Test%20Item%20Analysis.doc. (Lesson 3 – Handout 3)

  7. Using the CEFR: Principles of Good Practice (2011). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (In-class materials, Lesson 2, pp. 11-13; Lesson 5, Handout 1). 

  8. Video (Lesson 4), Retrieved from

http://www.englishprofile.org/

http://vocabulary.englishprofile.org/staticfiles/about.html

http://englishprofile.org/english-grammar-profile

 

Module Assessment (test type & marking system):

Participants take part in learning tasks individually or group work. Learning results will be assessed by teachers and peers based on the specific CEFR learning content engaged with learning outcomes.

 

No

Assessment

Weight

Type

Tasking

Learning Outcomes

Time of assessment

1

Theoretical Test

20%

Multiple choice/Quiz

Individual

LO 1

Lesson 2

2

Essay

30%

Written

Reflection

Individual

LO 2

Lesson 5

3

Final Exam

50%

Project

presentation

Individual & Group

LO 1

Lessons 3, 4, 5

 

Marking Schemes

  1. Project Presentation

  • Task detail:

  1. Task description:

Students work in groups of 3-4 to carry out a project that involves either researching an assigned topic or performing a task about/related to the CEFR and present their findings in class seminars.

 

The presentation should take the form of an informative presentation that describes and reflects on their work during the project. It should also convey knowledge and understanding of different aspects of the CEFR. 

 

Thorough research is required to have sufficient understanding of the topic to answer questions and handle discussions that follow. Students must consult various sources, e.g. books, periodicals, daily publications, electronic media, the Internet, etc. for this project. A PowerPoint slideshow to accompany the presentation is compulsory.

 

Each member of the group must be responsible for one part of the presentation. Time for each presentation is 30 minutes excluding Q & A (10 mins for Q & A). 

 

Assessment is based on group effort (60% of the total mark), as demonstrated by overall group preparation, proper structure and content, and appropriate use of visual aids, as well as individual effort (40% of the total mark), as demonstrated by ability to use verbal and nonverbal communication. (see the following table for a more detailed marking scheme)

 
  1. Marking scheme: 


    A. Group Performance (60%) 

 

 

Structure (10%) 

Introduction, body, conclusion; transitions, linking devices etc.) 

 

/100 

 

/10 

Content (40%) 

Recognition of the main points on CEFR, demonstrating understanding of the framework & handling of questions, etc. 

 

 

/100 

 

 

/40 

Visuals (10%) 

Slide design and use of visual aids 

 

/100 

 

/10 

Group total 

/60  

B. Individual Performance (40%) 

 

 

Verbal communication (20%) 

fluency, accuracy, range of vocab etc. 

 

/100 

 

/20 

Non-verbal communication (20%)  

voice, appearance, body language etc. 

 

/100 

 

/20 

Individual total 

/40 

 

 Total score (A + B) =              /100 

 

2. Essay (Written Reflection)

  • Task detail:

- Each student is required to submit a reflection which compares one skill at B1 level tested at VSTEP with the description of B1 in CEFR;

- Word length: 700 words (± 10%)


When marking students’ paper, the trainers will be looking at the following criteria:

1. Content: 70%

  • Introduce the selected skill for analysis;

  • State VSTEP assessments clearly;

  • Illustrate the tested ability through specific analyses of tasks given in the test;

  • Discuss the link between VSTEP and CEFR based on critical judgements; 

  • Conclude the relevance of VSTEP to CEFR; and

  • Provide recommendations (if any).

2. Language and Style: 30%

  • Have all required components;

  • Use appropriate language without spelling and grammatical errors

 

…..

/100

 

…..

/70

 

…..

/100

 

…..

/30

Total mark:          

/100


Grade Converting System

     

Lao grades

Vietnam grades

Grade level

Excellent

A=4,0

= 90-100%

9.0 – 10.0

Very good

B+ =3,5

= 80-89%

8.0 – 9.0 

Good

B=3,0

= 70-79%

7.0 – 7.9

Fairly good

C+=2,5

= 65-69%

6.5 – 6.9

Fair

C=2,0

= 60-64%

6.0 – 6.4 

Poor

D+=1,5

= 55-59%

5.5 – 5.9

Very poor

D=1,0

= 50-54%

5.0 – 5.4

Fail

F=x

< 50%

< 5.0